After an attorney hired to represent me successfully coerced, then demanded I give him an extra $5000.00, I went through the prescribed process to attempt recovery. First was the state (California) bar association's county office for help. A Fee Mediation
Hearing was held. Again, the attorney, using a combination of tactics created such confusion for the arbitrator she couldn't mask it in her Decision as well as the included narrative. Still able to realize a wrong had been committed, she calculated an amount
of $500.00. Her Decision included the filing fee for a total $850.00. A credit card cash transfer receipt for $2000 was missing at the arbitration hearing, due to the bank's inability to provide a copy in time for the hearing. The arbitrator was made aware
of the situation. She suggested I use a different appropriate court and revisit the issue, in the event the missing receipt was made available to me. When it arrived by mail soon after I filed a small claims action immediately. Thankfully, with all the evidence
necessary to establish my claim, the small claims judge wasn't swayed by the attorney's double, sometimes triple-speak. The judgment ordered the defendant to pay the remaining balance of $4500, plus the court costs and related fees. On the 30th day after the
Writ of Execution was filed the defendant filed an Appeal of the Decision. Within no more than two days after the Appeal Hearing was scheduled he then asked for a Continuance, claiming he had cases scheduled for the same day. More than a bit aggravated and
curious, I took it upon myself to verify the conflict. He was correct, he had ONE case, scheduled 90 minutes prior to the Appeal start time. The more troubling irregularity, for me, was this had been scheduled as a 'phone-in' appearance. While I am not aware
of courthouse vernacular, this particular term does not leave a person puzzled as to its meaning. But I digress. The end result was the Appeal was rescheduled to May 24th way back in the first week of March, 2013. At the time it seemed like forever. Now the
hearing has concluded and just when I was sure this defendant couldn't manipulate and pervert a very simple straightforward process, I find myself still somewhat frozen in place, in need of further thawing out. The tactics used this time, in my view, are just
too close to qualifying as criminal and even premeditated. Perhaps I might have an opportunity to properly discuss this part of the nightmare with someone, in real time. Quite honestly, I still feel a strong sense of anxiety and betrayal at the hands of this
individual. An opportunity to retell the events I witnessed this past Friday, at the very least, might offer some relief. Thank you in advance of your time and effort on my behalf as well as for providing help to reset my social balance. I continue to hold
onto the hope I will be fully reimbursed and the defendant will be given a powerful enough deterrent causing him to conduct matters in a more transparent and upstanding manner.
Get peace of mind through a 1-on-1 conversation online. On average, a professional responds in 7.5 minutes or less.
Prices start at $14-$20 for most questions. Compare that to a lawyer’s hourly fee or mechanic’s labor charge. Plus, you choose what to pay based on your needs.
With professionals verified by a leading third-party service, ongoing customer reviews, and an Advisory Board of first-class scholars, you can trust that we work hard to keep quality high.